NOTICE One formally advises ALL INTERESTED AND NON INTERESTED PARTIES, that, James, or James II, or King James, or King James II, or James Scot ...
Sunday, June 30, 2013
ONE'S FORMAL NOTICE RELATING TO CERTAIN CLAIMS MADE ON THIS LAND BY A MAN CLAIMING TO BE KING
Posted on 6:12 PM by Unknown
Saturday, June 29, 2013
ROYAL FAMILY GRANTED NEW RIGHT OF SECRECY
Posted on 6:12 AM by Unknown
Special exemptions to be written into Freedom of Information Act By Robert Verkaik Saturday 08 January 2011 The Royal Family is to be granted absolute protection from public scrutiny in a controversial legal reform designed to draw a veil of secrecy over the affairs of the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William. Letters, emails and documents relating to the monarch, her heir and the second in line to the throne will no longer be...
TRUSTEES, EXECUTORS & AGENCY CO LTD v COMMISSIONER OF LAND TAX [1915] HCA 35; (1915) 20 CLR 21 (21 MAY 1915)
Posted on 3:05 AM by Unknown
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAThe Trustees, Executors and Agency Company Limited and Others Appellants; and The Commissioner of Land Tax Respondent.H C of A21 May 1915Griffith C.J., Isaacs, Higgins, Gavan Duffy and Rich JJ.Weigall K.C. and Davis, for the appellants.Starke (with him Mann), for the respondent.The following judgments were read:—May 21Griffith C.J.This appeal, which is brought from an assessment of land tax made as of 30th June 1910, raises two questions: (1) as to the applicability of a provision which under the Principal Act stood as a...
R v KIDMAN [1915] HCA 58; (1915) 20 CLR 425 (16 SEPTEMBER 1915)
Posted on 2:53 AM by Unknown
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAThe King against Kidman and Others. H C of A 16 September 1915 Griffith C.J., Isaacs, Higgins, Gavan Duffy, Powers and Rich JJ. E. M. Mitchell, for the accused Kidman. Barton, for the accused O'Donnell. Leverrier K.C. and Rolin K.C. (with them Flannery and Windeyer), for the Crown. Mitchell, in reply, Griffith C.J., Isaacs, Higgins, Gavan Duffy, Powers and Rich JJ. Per Curiam. The motions to quash the indictment will be refused. The reasons for judgment will be given later. The following judgments were...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)