PUBLIC NOTICE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Read More

A THIRD ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION

Read More

ANOTHER PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION

Read More

PUBLIC NOTICE REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO THE AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION

Read More

ABC NSW PREMIER BARRY O'FARRELL PROPOSES LAWS TO LET POLICE SEARCH FOR GUNS WITHOUT WARRANT

ABC & Mikiverse Law Updated September 15, 2013

New South Wales Premier Barry O'Farrell has proposed new laws –read statutes– which will give police greater powers to search people for guns without a warrant.
The changes are to be introduced to Parliament this week and mean police would not need a warrant to search people who have been banned from owning weapons.
Their cars, homes and outlaw motorcycle gang club houses will also be able to be searched without a warrant.
Mr O'Farrell also plans to increase the prison term for anyone convicted of possessing or supplying guns to try to crack down on crime in Sydney.
Here is the propaganda right here. If this happens three times in a year and this actions lowers the count to twice a year then it has 'cracked down on crime'. Of course, in order to really make a difference then this would need to be occurring regularly enough so that removing it would make a noticeable difference despite the fact that it would not be affecting any summary crime and most indictable ones. 
This is about training people to accept that it is appropriate for the police to search them without a warrant. 
The jail term will increase from 10 to 14 years.
The Government says there are about 60 people who have been issued with firearm bans and he predicts the number will rise as police place a greater focus on gun crime.
So what were the police focusing on before that they considered more important than gun crime?
And, how does searching up to sixty people without warrants cause O' Farrell to predict a rise in the number of people who will be "issued with firearm bans". This is Orwellian doublespeak & i hope that you all can appreciate this and how this is employed by fear activists to drown out logic as well as to help expand the reach of the violent Agent Smith's of the government.
"Police will be able to stop and search them in their cars, in their homes, in their workplace, frankly there'll be no place for them to hide," he said.
Why do innocent people need to be hiding? Because of the greater invasions of people's liberties by government?
"Clearly –clear as mud, which is the point of his lie– these laws –read statutes– are about dealing with gun crime across Sydney, police are concerned –so what? why would we care about the opinions of a functionary body? This is more programming, having the police labelled as an 'authority figure' so you will accept their words as being authoritative as opposed to what they actually are, which is self-serving– about the activities of outlaw –are all motor cycle gangs "outlaw"s? motor cycle gangs and others and these laws will ensure that disorderly houses –the employment of the word disorderly is more programming– or crime dens can also be searched."
Labor has put forward similar proposals in the past, which suggests there could bipartisan support for the changes.
Well they are both essentially the same, despite the bleatings since tweedle dum beat tweedle dee in last weeks elections. Bad news for you if you were expecting change.
But civil libertarians have condemned the idea, arguing it erodes police accountability.
It does.
New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties president Cameron Murphy says a warrant provides legitimacy.
"What a search warrant does is confines the police's activities, so we know why they're searching, and ensures there's a legitimate reason for them to do so," he said.
In theory, this is correct, in practice generally not, but if you can handle your own affairs you'd be really surprised what you can achieve.
"By removing that level of accountability, all we do is set up the scene in the future for perhaps police corruption, because there's no accountability over their actions."
Well said.
In summation, this is what we call fear porn because it seeks to scare you with bullshit before providing a remedy that suits them and not you. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance said Jefferson, but, he wasn't competing against the idiot box for people's attentions. 
And lets not forget that any story on guns in the media is trying to program you to the logic that guns are violent and people should never have them. This programming works so well that i saw a man who identifies as being 'left-wing' belittle a man for supporting gun ownership by the people even though it was a violent, conniving murderous RIGHT WING politician that removed guns from the Australian population. 

http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/newshome/18935014/nsw-premier-barry-ofarrell-proposes-tougher-gun-search-powers/ 

 

Read More

VICTORIAN MENTAL HEALTH ACT 1986 – 'PLACING THE WORD 'PATIENT' UNDER THE MIKIVERSE MICROSCOPE

MIKIVERSE LAW SEPTEMBER 14, 2013 
This is an exercise at looking at aspects of the Mental Health Act 1986 so we might enjoy a better understanding of an act whose purpose is apparently to reform the Mental Health laws....
Did you know that the definition of the word "Involuntary Patient" as defined for the Victorian Mental Health Act 1986 has had its definition changed in 1991, 1995, 1996, 2003 & 2005?
Why does the meaning of a word change SIX times in 27 years? Are both the Liberal & Labor party incompetent at defining words? Given the fact that someone could be seriously harmed by a wrongful diagnosis, how much faith can we have in the definition of any word that is changed every 4 and 1/2 years?
 

Further to the last question, we see here that the word "security patient" has been defined SEVEN times in twenty seven years. Another way of looking at this is that two words that convey power to the state over the man, and to limit the freedoms of a man, has been changed THIRTEEN times in twenty seven years, or on average, every thirteen months or so, one of these definitions have changed.

If these people are so incompetent, why are we putting up with it?

Is it because incompetency is one of their smoke screens, designed to hide the truth which is that they do as they want believing that you will deal with the effects of the statutes rather than the causes that give rise to them in the first place?

Isn't it interesting how a body of words can convince men that to be violent against their fellow men?

Read More

INTERVIEW WITH WORLD FREEMAN SOCIETY DIRECTOR ROB MENARD

Wed, September 11 2013: World Freeman Society Director Rob Menard talks about what his group stands for and how it plans to proceed with “spiritual libertarianism” ideals.

http://globalnews.ca/video/832893/interview-with-world-freeman-society-director-rob-menard

Read More

COATES MAKE THREAT :)

Read More

RETIRED JUDGE SPILL THE BEANS

Retired Judge Spills the Beans by 

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com 

Read More

SWISSINDO AND ITCCS AND THE CASE OF THE EXPLODING HEAD

Saturday, 7 September 2013

While most of the time I refrain from the "He said" "She said" type crap that proliferates the Internet, occasionally something get's posted that jacks up my ire so much that I HAVE to respond ..... otherwise my head might explode.
These were brought to my attention about 15 minutes ago.  After I cleaned up the floor from all the exploding brain matter, I decided that I would finally address this openly and with full transparency.
Here is the first link for those of you who haven't read it yet:
http://giftoftruth.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/2013-08-15-itccs-oppt-donations.pdf  

2013.08.15
ITCCS & OPPT NOTICE – SOUTH AFRICA
CALLING ALL ONE PEOPLE!
ALL TRIBAL; CUSTOMARY; COMMON LAW COMMUNITIES & NATIONS!
ON THE LAND, COMMONLY KNOWN AS SOUTH AFRICA......

DO YOU WANT YOUR COMMON LAW PEACE AND
FREEDOM FOR SOUTH AFRICA?
DO YOU WANT ALL DEBTS SETTLED SEPTEMBER?
THEN DONATE NOW! We require funding for the One People, by the
One People, no matter how small! Take the first step and make a commitment
even if you are still too afraid to speak or step forward.
There is a new system rolling out. Go to www.i-uv.com;......

Before we even remotely delve into any of the finer details I want to make this perfectly clear to anyone out there that has read this and started scratching their heads:

The OPPT- The One People's Public Trust, nor the Trustees of the OPPT are involved with either ITCCS nor SWISSINDO.  Now.... I haven't been able to get a hold of Randall Hilner yet, but I just got off the phone with Caleb Skinner who has verified for 100% without a doubt that he has never asked for a single donation and he never had contact with anyone from these perceived organizations.   I know for an absolute FACT that Heather has not asked for or received any donations and has nothing to do with ITCCS nor (no matter how much they want her to) SWISSINDO.


So, if someone sends you a link or a document asking for donations on behalf of OPPT...... go tell them to jump in the lake.

As for the actual logistics of this ridiculousness...... OPPT was reconciled, along with all other Trusts, and the Trustees have retired from serving the now defunct One People's Public Trust.  So, as the OPPT no longer EXISTS...... they can't actually receive donations ANYWAY!!!!
The next document that was brought to my attention is this one that was released last night:

itccs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Main-Stream-Media-CEASE-AND-DESIST-LETTER.pdf

Next, my questions and comments on these documents:

- As the OPPT is no longer in existence, who is taking in donations under that former Trusts name?
- The only donations info is for the ITCCS and it gives a bank account number- WHY is the ITCCS asking for money/donations?
- Since when has ITCCS had anything to do with SWISSINDO and/or the UCC filings that were made by the OPPT trustees and then used by SWISSINDO to further their own political agenda?
- If the ITCCS needs money then why doesn't Mr. Sino just release some of it to them?..... oh wait! 
- As the Donations paper sets out that all debts (in only South Africa?) are to be wiped out by the end of September, then WHY do they need donations?
- .... ask for money then they have the gall to say right on the document that uninformed questions just waste time?!    Seriously?!?   *thud*
- SWISSINDO has never asked for or received any permission to make any statements/demands/negotiations to the United Nations on behalf of OPPT or it's Trustees.  Any Statements/demands/negotiations that SWISSINDO has made to ANYONE is solely based on their own actions and the actions of those people working with the perceived SWISSINDO  group.
Here's my take on all of this:  we KNOW that we are the Value.  We KNOW that our Value is exponentially and perpetually increasing as we each DO for the betterment of humanity and our planet..... yet SWISSINDO wants to  limit the Value to a monetary/financial tool and limit the amount of funds that each person is to have to a mere $6million with monthly limitations on how that money is to be handed out, and to set up 5 new kingdoms with rulers to oversee the governance of our planet (my interpretation of all the info I've received over the past few months).  Who gave SWISSINDO the RIGHT to hand out OUR Value?  Who gave SWISSINDO the RIGHT to choose rulers and to set up "new governance" on OUR behalf?
Yea....... bite me.
Anyway, I'm tired today and trying to cook dinner for my family so I probably should of written this when I wasn't hungry and grumpy, but....... Oh well.

In Closing, I would like to thank everyone involved in these documents for so fully and transparently outing themselves and their agendas.  I love Transparency and I love you. 
Thank you for playing your role so well.

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/swissindo-and-itccs-and-case-of.html

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More

EVERY DRIVER WHO REFUSES TO BLOW IS STRAPPED TO A TABLE, PUT IN A HEADLOCK, BLOOD FORCIBLY TAKEN

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com 

Read More

VIDEO: NJ STATE POLICE DASHBOARD CAMERA SHOWS INCIDENT WITH BERGEN COUNTY POLICE

YOU READ IT HERE FIRST: An incident on the New Jersey Turnpike involving two Bergen County Police Department officers and a trooper has New Jersey State Police calling for county authorities to investigate, CLIFFVIEW PILOT has learned.
“Our review shows that we can be proud of the way our officers reacted,” a State Police officer with direct knowledge of the incident told CLIFFVIEW PILOT while this story was being researched. “We can’t say the same for the other guys.”
The entire incident was recorded by the trooper’s dashcam, multiple sources confirmed. They also said that an NJSP major personally called on Bergen County Police Chief Brian Higgins to address the issue during a meeting last week.
Jeanne Baratta, the chief of staff for Bergen County Executive Kathleen Donovan, said that Higgins was handling the matter. She told CLIFFVIEW PILOT earlier this afternoon that she was trying to determine what happened, and how it was handled, for this story.
A text message was also left for Higgins at 11:30 a.m. and again at 3:50 p.m.
Besides questions about the incident, CLIFFVIEW PILOT was trying to determine why a county police officer was apparently stopping a motorist on the Turnpike, where State Police have jurisdiction.
State Police Lt. Stephen Jones this afternoon said that he couldn’t divulge much about the incident because it was still being investigated.
He did tell CLIFFVIEW PILOT that “there was an incident involving a uniformed trooper who stopped at the scene of a New Jersey Turnpike roadside arrest by plain-clothed Bergen County Police officers using an unmarked minivan.”
Jones added that the May 31 dust-up “occurred against the backdrop of three reports of police imposters wearing tactical vests performing armed robberies and carjackings in North Jersey using unmarked vehicles.”
He also said: “We have contacted Bergen County and both agencies are looking into the interaction.”
According to multiple sources with direct knowledge of the incident, the trooper approached the Dodge Caravan — which was equipped with police strobes — on the southbound shoulder of the Turnpike near the George Washington Bridge 11 days ago.
Approaching the vehicle, the trooper — who is assigned to the Newark barracks — reported spotting a man wearing a tactical vest and no visible badge outside the van, the sources told CLIFFVIEW PILOT.
The trooper reported that he held his weapon to his side for caution and ordered the man to show ID.
The officer complied — displaying Bergen County PD identification — but not before words were exchanged, the sources said.
The trooper then called in the report.
“Now you can get the f*** out of here,” the cop — identified by sources as BCPD Officer Robert Duboue — allegedly said to the trooper after calling in his own report.
The trooper allegedly replied: “I’m not leaving….I work here and will leave when the f*** I want.”
The argument continued, with Duboue allegedly backing the trooper to the guard rail, the sources said.
The two “went chest-to-chest and face-to-face,” one of them told CLIFFVIEW PILOT.
A BCPD officer identified by sources as Sgt. Gabriel Escobar then showed up and allegedly joined Duboue in berating the trooper, who told them of the impersonating incidents, the sources said.
On May 26, authorities reported that a vehicle was pulled over on the Turnpike outside Newark by two men wearing what looked like police clothing — one of them armed with a semi-automatic handgun — who carjacked the motorist. A previous incident on May 16 followed a similar scenario, law enforcement sources told CLIFFVIEW PILOT.

http://cliffviewpilot.com/video-nj-state-police-dashboard-camera-shows-incident-with-bergen-county-police/ 

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More

FULL COURT OF SA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS LABOR GOVERNMENT'S ANTI-HOON LEGISLATION

Chief Court Reporter Sean Fewster The Advertiser September 02, 2013

A LEGAL ruling that paved the way for drivers to seek compensation for crushed and impounded cars has been overturned by the state's highest court.

The Full Court of the Supreme Court today allowed an appeal, by the State Government, against a ruling its anti-hoon driving laws were unconstitutional.
In a unanimous decision, the court reinstated forfeiture orders on Port Pirie man Graeme Bell's $5000 ute following his third drink-driving conviction in a decade.
The decision brings to an end almost 12 months of uncertainty about the laws and means dozens of cases being heard under the legislation - which were on pause pending the ruling - can go ahead.
Under the Criminal Law (Clamping, Impounding and Forfeiture of Vehicles) Act (2007), drivers who commit offences such as drink-driving and excessive speeding twice in 12 months, or three times in 10 years, forfeit their vehicles.
In 2011, courts ordered the destruction or sale of 210 of the 7932 cars that had been clamped and impounded by SA Police.
In October last year, Mr Bell filed a Supreme Court challenge against the enforced forfeiture of his ute.
Mr Bell's appeal was granted by Supreme Court Chief Justice Chris Kourakis, who found the Act removed the judiciary's constitutional independence.
Chief Justice Kourakis said the effect of the wording of the Act was that judges:
MUST order forfeiture whenever a prosecutor asks.
LACKED discretion to say no, or to vary the terms of the forfeit.
MUST order forfeiture even if it interferes with, or adds to, an offender's existing penalty.
He said that went against the concept of judicial independence, as enshrined in the Australian Constitution.
He said the law also meant:
FORFEITURE was often the most substantial part of the penalty.
PROSECUTORS, not the courts, controlled how severe that punishment was because they selected the car to be forfeited.
COURTS were being forced to act politically and punish people months after their offence had been committed.
It was the second time that a Rann-era law had been deemed constitutionally "repugnant", following the failure of the anti-bikie legislation in 2010.
In her judgment today, Justice Trish Kelly said the anti-bikie and anti-hoon laws were markedly different.
Under the scrapped anti-bikie laws, courts were obliged to impose control orders on members of groups that had been deemed criminal by the State Government.
However, car forfeiture occurred only after a person had amassed three court-imposed convictions for driving offences.
"It is not an executive decision but three judicial determinations which ... trigger the exercise of power," she said.
Justice Kelly said a latter section of the Act gave judges the right to refuse a forfeiture order if it would cause undue hardship to an offender.
That, she said, was discretion enough.
"The court retains a real discretion to ensure that the property of innocent third parties will not be involved in a forfeiture and to ameliorate any risk of any unforeseen financial and physical hardship of a severe nature being caused to a person whose vehicle is forfeited," she said.
Justice Malcolm Blue said High Court precedent held that prosecutors in criminal cases could "dictate components" of penalties.
He said it was not for the Full Court to decide High Court precedent had been "superseded or overruled".
Justice Kevin Nicholson agreed, saying the original penalty against Mr Bell should be reinstated.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/full-court-of-sa-supreme-court-upholds-labor-government8217s-antihoon-legislation/story-fni6uo1m-1226709182082
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More

HOUR OF TRUTH 5 OPPT CROATIA & RADIO LIBERUM 16 07 2013

Published on 2 Aug 2013

Welcome to our 5th OPPT Croatia Radio Show - HOUR of TRUTH.

***** Today's Guests: DEAN CLIFFORD from Canada and DRAZEN from Croatia

- Today's show is all in English because we have a very special guest, the one and only Dean Clifford. Otherwise our show is every Tuesday and features English speaking Guest in the first part of the show and the rest is with Croatian speaking guest.

You can listen Live here: http://radioliberum.caster.fm from 18-19 Hours CET or here http://radioliberum.listen2myradio.com

- Discussing OPPT filing and foreclosing of all Governments, Banks, all Corporations and actions taken in other Countries

- Croatian part is educational part for Croatian people regarding understanding of OPPT filings, power of their free will and how to challenge the PTW.

 

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com  

Read More

‘SOVEREIGN CITIZEN’ MOVEMENT WORRYING OFFICIALS AS 30,000 CLAIM THEY ‘FREED’ THEMSELVES FROM CANADA’S LAWS

Dene Moore, Canadian Press | 13/09/02 | Last Updated: 13/09/02

Darryl Dyck / The Canadian PressBrian Alexander, of Kamloops, B.C. on Monday August 26, 2013. Alexander is a self-proclaimed Freeman-on-the-Land and one of a growing number of Canadian followers of the so-called "sovereign citizen" or "Natural Persons" movement.

He introduces himself as “Brian Arthur of the Alexander family,” and before he’ll answer any questions, he asks a reporter to declare that she is not a government employee.
He drives without a licence and does not pay income tax.
Brian Alexander is a self-proclaimed Freeman-on-the-Land and one of a growing number of Canadian followers of the so-called “sovereign citizen” or “Natural Persons” movement.
Adherents have “freed” themselves from what they see as an overbearing government that has overstepped its bounds.
“People can’t afford to live and they’re basically destroying society, in our view,” Alexander says during a lengthy interview at his home in Kamloops, B.C.

"People can’t afford to live and they’re destroying society"

“They’ve created it themselves. Most of us are peaceful. We paid our taxes, we love our country and all that but when they start pushing at you, you tend to start asking questions and that’s where this whole movement comes from.”
Alexander says violence is not advocated and has no place in the movement, but one official who has followed the rise of the sovereign citizen movement in Canada says there have been a number of confrontations in B.C. and elsewhere during routine traffic stops or legal proceedings.
“We’ve seen that escalation already,” says Ron Usher, of the Society of B.C. Notaries.
Notaries have found themselves embroiled as many Freeman attach inexplicable importance to having notaries authorize documents the Freeman have invented to declare their status.
“What we’ve seen over the last year is an increasing level of frustration, an increasing level of desperation. People just don’t like the idea that someone isn’t going to help them with their fantasy,” Usher says, noting the society discourages its members from signing the “nonsensical” legal documents.
“They’re very confrontational. We’ve had a number of instances now where they’ve needed to call police or security,” Usher says.
There have been a number of “hard take-downs” by police in B.C. involving Freemen who refuse to have a driver’s licence and, sometimes, automobile insurance.
The Law Society of B.C. and B.C. Notaries have both issued warnings about Freemen, which the law society said in a bulletin last year may number as many as 30,000 in Canada.
“Since one of the tenets of the Freeman-on-the-Land movement is an unrestricted right to possess and use firearms, they raise significant safety and security concerns,” says the bulletin, which advises lawyers who come across Freemen to take appropriate security measures.
RCMP and the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police officers are currently developing awareness materials for frontline officers, and the movement is the subject of upcoming policing seminars in Vancouver and Toronto.
“The RCMP is aware of the Freeman-on-the-Land ideology and the interaction that some police jurisdictions have had with individuals who follow this movement. Additionally, in the recent years, the RCMP has received correspondence directly from followers of this movement,” RCMP spokeswoman Julie Gagnon says in an email.
“Individuals associated to this movement are a concern because some followers advocate violence to promote their views and this may involve violence toward police officers. There are officer safety concerns when dealing with followers of this movement during routine police interaction.”

"To paint all Freemen as terrorists, it would be the same as painting all Frenchmen FLQ or all Germans Nazis"

There’s no indication that they pose a threat to the general public, Gagnon says.
In the United States, the FBI considers the movement a domestic terror threat, and a 2011 FBI report cites several cases where followers have clashed with law enforcement, including the 2010 shootings of two Arkansas officers during a routine traffic stop.
“Although the sovereign-citizen movement does not always rise to violence, its members’ illegal activities and past violent _ including fatal — incidents against law enforcement make it a group that should be approached with knowledge and caution,” it says.
And it warns the movement will likely grow, fuelled by the recent economic downturn and the popularity of seminars being held across the country.

If there is a guru of the Freeman movement in Canada these days it’s a man named Dean Clifford from Manitoba. In June, about 80 people paid to hear Clifford spread the sovereign gospel at a seminar in Victoria and tickets are now available on his website to another scheduled for Toronto this November.
Alexander, 43, has become a pseudo-spokesman in B.C. after running — ironically — for provincial and municipal office under the Freeman banner.
A self-employed father of a teenaged boy, he speaks emotionally about the plight soldiers have faced upon their return from Afghanistan and with frustration about the degradation of the environment. And he appears to genuinely disagree with the use of violence or threats in the name of the cause.
“Yes, there has been the odd person here and there that has actually fought back and done some stupid things, but those are individuals. And to paint all Freemen as terrorists, it would be the same as painting all Frenchmen FLQ or all Germans Nazis. It’s kind of ridiculous,” he says.

It appeals to the angry male whose life isn’t working out

While in the United States the movement has a large following on the far right and among white supremacists, in Canada it has found sympathizers among First Nations, in B.C. in particular, where some have come together under the banner of the “Sovereign Squamish Government.”
The Squamish group claims to distribute its own licence plates and one Ontario Freeman is recruiting his own police force with an online video appeal for the Canadian Common Corps of Peace Officers.
The sovereign citizen’s campaign in Canada, however, focuses on the courts, and a quick search of court documents involving Freemen reveals a litany of cases from the East Coast to the West, ranging from the bizarre to the criminal.
Police officers, Crown lawyers and judges have been sued or been named in multimillion-dollar “liens” or “ecclesiastical notices” or other legal manoeuvres.

Darryl Dyck / The Canadian PressBrian Alexander, of Kamloops, B.C. Alexander is a self-proclaimed Freeman-on-the-Land and one of a growing number of Canadian followers of the so-called "sovereign citizen" or "Natural Persons" movement.

Dozens of sovereign citizens have found themselves in front of a judge facing tax evasion, contempt or criminal charges.
Last month, Warren Fischer, a practitioner of traditional Chinese medicine in Nelson, B.C., broke down in tears in court after being convicted of tax evasion.
An adherent to Freeman philosophies and a member of the Sovereign Squamish Nation, Fischer refused for several years to pay income tax, saying he did not want his taxes to support the war overseas. He will be sentenced in October.
Last year Daren Wayne McCormick was convicted in a Nova Scotia court of uttering threats toward officers and sentenced to just over three years in a federal prison when a judge disagreed with his argument that he’d freed himself of the Criminal Code and federal gun laws.
“It appeals to the angry male whose life isn’t working out very well,” says Usher. “You get this spiral of legal mess that the only person that’s benefited is the person who’s taken their money for the seminar teaching them how to do all this.
“It looks like desperate people spending their last nickel on bad advice.”
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/09/02/sovereign-citizen-movement-worrying-officials-as-30000-claim-they-freed-themselves-from-canadas-laws/
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com  

Read More