IRELAND COPYRIGHT BATTLE: NEWSPAPERS DEMAND FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR SHARING LINKS

Published: 7 January, 2013

The body representing Ireland’s main newspapers is demanding a minimum of $400 for third parties to directly link their articles, sparking an unprecedented copyright row which strikes at the very heart of sharing content on the World Wide Web.

The National Newspapers of Ireland (NNI) – which represents 16 national daily, Sunday and weekly newspapers, and 25 regional newspapers – defended their contentious position on Irish newspapers being linked to by third parties.
The union argued that "that display and transmission of links does constitute an infringement of copyright" under current Irish law if done for commercial purposes without prior consent and payment.
The NNI claimed it is not attempting to crack down on private persons sharing links on social media websites like Facebook or Twitter, saying "there is a distinction between the sending and receipt of links for personal use on the one hand and the sending and receipt of links for commercial purposes on the other."
Opponents of the move have argued that there is no legal basis to view the publication of hyperlinks as a copyright infringement.
The NNI said that the move was prompted by an ongoing review of existing copyright law by Ireland's Copyright Review Committee, which recently issued a consultation paper requesting that “interested parties” forward submissions on the issue.
In response to the consultation paper, the NNI is currently lobbying to have Ireland’s copyright laws classify the act of linking as copyright infringement.
“We understand that some people do not agree with that interpretation of the law,” the NNI said in a press release on Friday. “Equally, there are others who do agree with it. As already indicated, the Committee itself acknowledged that there are divided views on this. We await, in due course, the final report from the Copyright Review Committee and await sight of whatever they might say or recommend on the point.”
Debate over the issue came to the forefront when domestic violence charity group Woman’s Aid was told by an NNI subsidiary it must pay $400 to display between one and five hyperlinks to newspaper articles on its site.
Simon McGarr, the charity's lawyer, decried the move in a scathing op-ed titled '2012: The year Irish newspapers tried to destroy the web.'
McGarr argued that the “web is built on links,” as “links are what has made it so powerful and so threatening to established institutions of power.” He further derides the NNI’s contention that the right to link or not to link “is within the grace and favor of newspapers to grant – or by implication to refuse.”
McGarr was particularly scornful of the NNI’s price list, which outlined a $1,760 fee for publishing 26 to 50 hyperlinks, while 50 or more was designated as “negotiable.”
Writing for The Irish Times – an NNI member often considered the country’s newspaper of record – the daily’s online editor Hugh Linehan said they supported “the NNI position that copyright over newspaper content should be protected.”
However, “We recognize that linking is the lifeblood of the online world and we encourage our digital community to share links as widely as possible,” Linehan wrote. “Therefore, The Irish Times does not see links as copyrightable and will not attempt to impose any restrictions on the posting elsewhere on the Internet of mere URLs that refer to its content.”
The NNI has maintained that the unlicensed publication of hyperlinks is often symptomatic of greater copyright violations.
“Whenever NLI (Newspaper Licensing Ireland Limited) has required as an organization to take such a license, the organization has also engaged, for commercial purposes, in some other ‘copying activity’ in addition to the display of links (for example, where the organization has reproduced either the text of the article itself or an extract from it alongside the links).”
The NNI’s attempts to bolster control over the dissemination of its newspapers’ content mirrors broader efforts throughout Europe to force search engines like Google to share the profits generated by the online information industry.
Draft laws are currently being considered in France and Germany that would require Google to pay a licensing fee, to compensate domestic news sites for the use of their material.
Google has responded aggressively, threatening to stop linking to certain European news sites if they are forced to pay.
http://rt.com/news/irish-newspapers-charge-hyperlink-510/print/

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More

EJP ISSUES A DESERVED RETRACTION TO JESUIT TEMPORAL COADJUTOR FRANK O’COLLINS AND FRANK'S RESPONSE

By EJP  /   October 5, 2010

Map of Satanic Pentagram; Great Vatican Jesuit Ley Lines of Evil During World War II, 1944

Dear Frank,

Apparently, we have some misunderstandings between us.

First, I have praised your work with regard to the satanic Pentagram you mapped out connecting the Nazi Death Camps within that Pentagram.  I posted that work and it is still available in my “Archives.”  I recommend it  and it can be viewed here.  Again, I say well done.

Map of the Jewish Pale of Settlement, 1900

Secondly, I have praised your work as to your rightly connecting Stalin and Hitler working together in exterminating the Jews of the geographical area within that Pentagram, the Old Pale of Settlement first established by that pawn of the Jesuits, Catherine II “the Great” of Russia.  That work of yours is also posted in my “Archives.”  I recommend it.  Again, well done.  This is your “meat” which I encourage all to “eat” while on your website.

However, I have never agreed with you on the following points indicated in your missive below:

1.  That Venice or “the Venetians” control anything—Never!  I have always said that the Jesuits control Venice and thus the Venetian leaders in general.  The Order has maintained a death grip over Venice and its blue-blood “Venetians” since no later than 1797.  In that year, the Order’s “Great Avenger,” Napoleon Bonaparte I, destroyed the “liberal,” pro-Reformation, Republic of Venice.  Further, within the Secret Instructions of the Jesuits, it focuses special attention on “the Venetians” as their enemies, enemies submitted to the Black Pope by no later than 1800 and remain so today.  Of the Order’s disdain for the Venetians we read in its Secret Instructions, Chapter XIV, Section VI on pages 129 and 131in Brownlee’s 1857 edition:

“Nor let such [disaffected Jesuits] by any means be retained as either openly oppose their superiors, on, in public or private, make complaints against them to their fellow-members, but especially to strangers; or such as condemn, to their associates, or strangers, the conduct of the Society in the amassing or management of temporal goods, or any other of our methods of proceeding; as for instance, our suppressing, and keeping under all either disaffected to, or expelled from our order, &c. or that admit in conversation, or defend the Venetians, French, or others, who by hindering us from getting a footing among them, have done the Society intolerable damages.”  [Emphasis in bold]

This “Venetian distraction” away from the nexus of world political power now wielded by Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Nicolas is a typical Jesuit tactic.  Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Webster Tarpley is given over to this same misinformation, and this same tactic is now employed by you.  Frank, do you really believe that the ubiquitous Jesuit Order now ruling New York City, Washington, DC, Moscow, Paris, Berlin, London, Madrid, Brussels, Beijing, Tokyo, Lisbon, Istanbul, etc., does not rule Venice via its Masonic agents and Roman Hierarchy, specifically Venetian Patriarch Cardinal Angelo Scola?  Apparently you do believe in “the Venetian Power” and advocate such misinformation.

2.  That the Venetians control the Vatican.  This is tacitly absurd on anyone’s part to believe such Jesuit propaganda especially in light of Napoleon’s Jesuit-ordered destruction of the Republic of Venice, which “liberal” Roman Catholic republic had banned the Order due to Pope Clement XIV’s Bull of Suppression and Extinction promulgated in 1773, which bull was honored in Venice as a matter of obedience to the pope.  This same obedience was rendered by the Roman Catholic nobility of Bavaria (Wittelsbachs) and Austria (Habsburgs) for which reason Napoleon attacked and humbled both Roman Catholic countries.  Further, at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, Pope Pius VII, who had just restored the Order in August of 1814, was given back his Papal States, he returning to the title of “King of the Papal States,” and Venice was given to Roman Catholic Austria ruled by Knight of Malta Prince von Metternich, or as the Saxons called him, “Prince Midnight.”  No, the Venetians control Nothing!  They are like us Americans—licking the boots of our resident Jesuits or Roman Hierarchy as they rule from a distance.

Now, as to my claim that you are anti-Jew, basically supporting the Jesuit propaganda that the Jews rule the world, I will retract upon a few clarifications on my part.  First, as per below, you claim the term “Jew” is a “fraud and a hoax.”  You then seek to prove your claim based upon certain “facts” upon which you rely.  They are:

A.  That the southern tribe of Judah (English “J”) or Yehudah (Hebrew “Y”) was not known as “Judah.”  As a matter of semantics, I will cede your claim providing we agree that either term designates the same racial people—in addition to the tribe of Benjamin.  These people are known as “Yehudim,” (Hebrew) or “Y’hudai” (Aramaic) or “Iudaeum” (Latin) or “Jude” (German) or “Judio” (Spanish) or “Jews” as we English-speakers know the term.  Same racial people, same tribal name, but spelled differently as per the language in question.  Further, the book of Jeremiah is clear in that both a “Hebrew” and a “Jew” are identical peoples (Jeremiah 34:9):

“That every man should let his manservant, and every man his maidservant, being an Hebrew or an Hebrewess, go free; that none should serve himself of them, to wit, of a Jew his brother.”

B.  That the people of the Northern Kingdom were never known as “Israelites.”  It is a matter of established biblical and secular history that upon the death of King Solomon and the accession of his son King Rehoboam, the nation of Israel split.  That split resulted in the ten tribes to the north called “Israel” and the two tribes to the south called “Judah.”  This is reflected throughout the writings of the prophets, Jeremiah being one of them.  In Jeremiah 31:31-34, the promise is that God would establish a New Covenant with “the house of Israel” and with “the house of Judah.” Verse 31 reads:

“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:”

Thus, your claim that the people of the Northern Kingdom were never known as “Israelites” is utterly without historical foundation or biblical merit.

C.  That the people of the Northern Kingdom in general were not known as “Israelites,” but as “Sarmatians.”  This is utter nonsense!  Amidst the 10 tribes of Israel inhabiting the Northern Kingdom its capital being Samaria, there were a people called “Samaritans,” not “Sarmatians” as there was no such place as “Sarmara.”  These Samaritans were racially half-Israelite and half-Assyrian.  They were not “Jews” according to the conversation of Jesus the Messiah with the Samaritan woman at the well in the region of Samaria (John 4:22).  (During the First Century, Samaria was a small region within the land of the Northern Kingdom to which these racially half-Hebrew/Israelites were confined and the racial Hebrew/Israelites had no dealings with them.  They were regarded as racially impure, which impurity was provable through the genealogical records within the Second Temple.)  Now there are such a people as “Sarmatians” connected with the Scythians, but they are of no relation to the topic at hand.  In fact, to use the term Sarmatian in attempting to connect it to people of the Northern Kingdom of Israel without distinguishing the real Sarmatian people as per above, is misleading at best and dishonest at worst.  By this position of yours, you confuse the real identity of the 10 tribes of Israel in the north having in fact descended from the Jew, Abraham.  Yes, Abraham was the physical progenitor of the racial Jews who opposed Christ the Jew (John 8:22, 37).  Thus, in deliberately confusing the identity of the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites, are you not in fact anti-Jew?  Hitler knew who “the Jews” were, for he called them “Hebrews,” “Israelites” and “Jews” in his speeches and throughout Jesuit-trained Joseph Goebbels’ propaganda, spoken and written.

D.  That the theology and worship of the Northern Kingdom was not the same as the worship of the Southern Kingdom.  For a time, this was true.  The ten northern tribes had given themselves over to the worship of Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Milcom the god of the children of Ammon (I Kings 11:33).  For this idolatry, Israel was taken captive by Assyria in 723 BC; later Judah would be taken captive by Babylon in 606 BC.  Further, according to Jeremiah 32:32-35 both the children of Israel and the children of Judah sacrificed to Molech (having no relation to an Owl) and to Baal.  Thus, the worship of both kingdoms was Satanic and anti-Jehovah God.

E.  That there were priests of “Yahud” who were called “Cohen Gadol” or “Cohen” while the priests of the “Sarmatians” by the fourth century AD were called “Rabbi.”  This assertion would be laughable if not so diabolical in its ramifications.  First, the priests for the Northern Kingdom were the same family of priests for the Southern Kingdom.  They were called “Levites.”  These Levites were descended from Levi, one of the 12 sons of Jacob/Israel.  The priesthood could only be fulfilled by the racial sons of Levi, just as the High Priest could only be filled by the pure, racial sons of Aaron, Moses’ brother of the tribe of Levi.  The Cohen name is widespread and is connected to the tribe of Levi, but it is a family name and one of the 24 courses of the Levitical priesthood, not a separate priesthood from the Levites.  The term “Rabbi” was applied to the racial Jew, racial Son of David, the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth himself (John 1:49).  Thus “Rabbi” is a biblical term that can be applied to any learned individual of the children of Israel, regardless of the tribe to which he belongs.  Again, this distinction which you espouse is false, is nonexistent and leads to confusion as to the real identity of just who are the real Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites of scripture and antiquity.  Is this not essentially anti-Jewish propaganda?

F.  That it is an “absurdity, a fiction bearing not truth to the past” to combine the people of both the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah under one term.  According to the historical record in the Word of God—the Reformation English Bible translated from the Hebrew Masoretic Text and Greek Textus Receptus, you are dead wrong.  According to the foremost writers of history throughout the 19th century, you again are wrong.  All 12 tribes (13 in fact, as the tribe of Joseph was split into Manasseh and Ephraim) are racially descended from Jacob through four different women.  They are a race of people called the “Hebrews” (Exodus 1:16; 3:18) as Abraham, the father of the nation, was called a “Hebrew” (Genesis 14:13).  They are called “the children of Israel” (Exodus 1:7, 12) as Jacob’s name was also “Israel” (Genesis 49:1).  Jacob’s son Joseph was a “Hebrew” (Genesis 39:14), thus Joseph’s two sons who would father two of the ten Northern tribes were also “Hebrews.”  To this nation was committed the Mosaic Law, the people of that nation of Israel being called “Jews” by the Apostle Paul (Romans 3:1-2).  The Apostle Paul was an Israelite, of the tribe of Benjamin and a Hebrew (Philippians 3:5; II Corinthians 11:22) yet also a “Jew” (Acts 22:3) speaking in the “Hebrew” language (Acts 22:2).  Indeed, the people of both Northern and Southern kingdoms are racial Hebrews, are racial Israelites and are racial “Jews.”  According to the Bible, to create a difference, other than specific tribal distinctions, is dishonest, misleading and ultimately seeks to remove the conscious reality of the Genesis 12:1-3 curse put upon any nation persecuting these racial people of the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant misidentified by you as not being racial “Jews,” but rather “Yehudim.”

G.  That is impossible to derive the English word “Jew” from the Hebrew “Yehuda.”  Your disdain for the word “Jew” impairs your logic and your ability to be objective.  “Yhuwdah” is merely the Hebrew for “Judah;” “Yhuwdiy” the Hebrew for “Judaite” or in the English, “Jew.”  “Ioudaios” is Greek for “Jew” as attests the work of both Strong’s and Young’s Concordances.    In fact, every concordance, dictionary, lexicon, Greek-English interlinear text and systematic theology that I have ever seen all translate both proper nouns as “Jew.”  Your position cannot stand the test of either biblical and historical scrutiny.  Therefore, why do you propose such a novel theory—the same exact theory that my ex-Jesuit adviser put upon me when I was revising Vatican Assassins I?  Frank, in resisting the use of the English word “Jew” you are falsely propounding a theory that ultimately leads to anti-Jewish fury.  This is the same doctrine taught by the Identity cult, the KKK cult and other hatefully racist, White Supremacist cults.  Frank, I know these people and they have vehemently advocated this exact, same, lying, anti-Bible, anti-”Jew” doctrine.

H.  That the Venetians are the slavemasters of the Jesuits and the Vatican.  Again, this is absurd and refuted above as said position is nothing more than Jesuit casuistry.

But on to the most pressing issue of your attack upon the Apostle Paul of the New Testament.  On your website, you consider this man of God to be one of the most evil men who ever lived.  Now this is quite fascinating, although extremely grievous, as I have addressed this with you privately before.  In attacking the man whom God used to write 14 of the 27 books of the New Testament, you attempt to destroy the very doctrines championed during the Protestant Reformation.  Remembering that the Reformation brought the world out of the Pope’s Dark Ages by 1648, your attack furthers the Jesuit Order’s Counter Reformation by encouraging men to turn away from the true testimony of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ and seek another way of salvation or “religion.”  You undermine the very foundation of the predominantly Calvinistic, White Protestant Western Nations.  In so doing, you render my peoples helpless in resisting the Satanic Jesuit Order’s ceaseless attack upon the Protestant Bibles, Protestant Constitutions and Protestant liberties secured by those written Constitutions.  A Jesuit under Extreme Oath of Induction could do no better; your uncle, a powerful Vatican Jesuit, would be proud of you.

In conclusion, I will continue to refer to you as a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor for the following reasons as per above and summarized below:

1.  You twist the meaning of the underlying Hebrew and Greek words translated “Jews” into another meaning that is incorrect and ultimately leads to anti-Jewish fury.

2.  You blame the Venetians as being the real power behind the Jesuit Order and the Vatican Empire, which immense global Empire that Society of Jesus rules with an iron fist in a velvet glove.

3.  You seek to undermine the Pauline Epistles which provide the theological basis for Luther, Calvin and Knox’s Protestant Reformation, i.e., sola scriptura, sola fidei, etc.

HOWEVER, I will retract and correct my statement alleging that you teach there is a World Jewish Conspiracy. You are however only a heartbeat away from said doctrine once another Jesuit comes along and attempts to prove “the Venetians,” who, according to your theory, rule the world, are in fact “crypto Jews.”  Both Roman Catholics Lyndon LaRouche and Webster Tarpley advocate your Venetian world-rule-theory and they are indeed Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors.

It is good that prayer be made for you Frank, as there is only salvation and forgiveness of sins in the finished work of the risen and reigning Lord Jesus Christ.  I will be praying, that if you be one of God’s elect, He will grant you repentance from your sins and faith in believing the glorious gospel of the grace of God in Christ.  For there is no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved, save the name of Jesus Christ in antithesis to Satan’s wicked pope of Rome bolstered by his Praetorian Guard, the Company of Jesus.

I consider this discussion closed and thank you for your correction in measure.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric

Dear Eric,

It has been some time since we have conversed. The last time I think was regarding the important insights concerning anecdotal evidence of the Great Jesuit Vatican Pentagram of Evil in WWII- a 300 mile wide satanic Pentagram that is perfectly geometrically formed from the very worst Death Camps – pointing directly North to the North Pole/North Star and symbol of the United Nations.

At the time you praised the importance of this research in revealing the murder of millions in the name of religion – particularly those of the Jewish faith – was an orchestrated religious sacrifice by the Venetian controlled Jesuits and Vatican, not a racist motivated genocide.  Most importantly, you showed deep respect and belief in the truth that this information came directly from dream and vision-  I believe from those who died and now seek the truth to be revealed.

Since you have been in close contact with very senior Venetians and others, I am now saddened to see you now not only repudiate this research done in the memory of those murdered by liars, anti-Semitics and religious fanatics, but now openly accuse me of being the very thing I have been working against.

You are perfectly entitled to repudiate the very things you claim you wish to expose- the Luciferian agenda of Jesuits, their Venetian Controllers, the Vatican and their Knights of Malta.

You are not the first “truth researcher” to want to try and hide and discredit such historic revelations as the 300 mile wide pentagram in Poland that links to form a perfect “square” at the north pole (symbol of UN power) with its smaller satanic pentagon cousin in Washington and founded on September 11, 1941.

How you happily live your life and sleep at night with such contradictions is between you and the Divine.

But to know the source of this information on the Vatican-Jesuit Pentagram of Evil and to still print such awful lies, to deliberately want to discredit this background by attacking me as some kind of anti-Semite is quite simply the act of a man without an ounce of integrity, morality or belief in God.

The other possibility is that you have been convinced by “others” to say and write such rubbish. You are perfectly entitled to write, speak or say anything you like – even to conclude whatever criticism you may of me. But not to lie and claim me as anti-Semitic.

I formerly request you retract your most recent assertion that I have ever in my writings blamed the “Jews” or subscribe to the “Great Jewish Conspiracy” as you have written.

If you do not retract such false claims, then I can only assume you are far from what you say you are and indeed are the very reverse of what you claim.

Just as the pamphlet “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” first published in 1903 in Russia is a horrible fraud and hoax, so too is the very word “Jew” itself.

The original inhabitants of the southern Kingdom we now know as the “Kingdom of Judah” were known as the Yahudi of Yahudah, not Judah.  Nor were the people of the northern kingdom known as “Israelites” but Sarmatians of Sarmara.

These groups were poles apart in their outlook on life, theology and ritual.  The Yahudi worshipped a monotheistic supreme being, while the Sarmatians worshipped a pantheon of demons, most notably Ba’al Moloch- the ancient incarnation of Satan/The Devil and Lucifer. The priests of the Yahud were called Cohen Gadol or Cohen, while the priests of the Sarmatians by the 4^th Century were called “Rabbi”

Prior to the 16th Century there simply was no “universal word” that combined these two separate groups, with separate religions –because to force these two separate kingdoms and groups of priest kings into one term would have represented an absurdity—a fiction bearing no truth to the past.

The 16th Century term “Jew” is variously claimed said to come from Old French giu, which is supposed to come from an earlier version juieu and then from latin iudeus and Greek Ioudaios. However this is cleverly and deliberately misleading. Ioudaios  is the Greek equivalent of the term Yahudah not Jew. It is impossible to get the word “Jew” from Ioudaios as it is from Yahudah.

Therefore, please do not falsely paint me as “anti-semitic” for I continue to use accurate labels that have nothing to do with the false word “Jew”.

Finally, I will pray for your soul. For no more wicked there be than the deceivers who stand and claim as truth, but curse the name of God.

I pray you will be forgiven for such awful hatred towards the visions and revelations from those murdered by the Jesuits, the Vatican and their Venetian Slavemasters.

Cheers

Frank
http://www.vaticanassassins.org/ejp-issues-a-deserved-retraction-to-jesuit-temporal-coadjutor-frank-ocollins/ 

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More

A COLLECTION OF LEGAL WORDS WITH THEIR INFERENCES AND MEANINGS

This little gem came from Sir mika-Sovereign, a free-man that isn't an employee of the business that is registered and trades as CANADA. It contains information that most of us already know, but, mika has kindly codified it and posted it on facebook. It is useful to see all of this together, so I'm sharing with all of you (especially those of you who do not facebook) for your benefit. Maybe you can print out some copies and share them round the watercooler so people can become more aware.   

Perception is everything ,
Government words and then the realities they hide,

Legal = man made law created to restrict everything you do
Statute = slave rules that are revised based on necessity
Terrorists = freedom fighters and government watchdogs
Lawful = natural law that the police are not taught
Legal arrest = Unlawful assault without accountability
Legal confiscation = Unlawful theft of registered property
Illegal Possession = unregistered property or plants
application = begging for permission to do lawful things
registration = Informing on yourself /giving legal title to issuer
Legal Taxation = Unlawful extortion enforced by policy enforcement agents
legal vehicle = registered automobile
Resisting arrest = plausible deniability for police assault
Legal courtroom = administrative offices for fine collection and additional charges
Foreign policy = war for profit , theft of resources and murder of innocents
Gun control = disarming slaves
License = unlawful permission enforced by coercion and fraud
Compulsory Insurance = racketeering scheme
apprehend = abduct / kidnap
stake out = Unlawful entrapment / surveillance
Garnishee = state sponsored banking theft
summons = invitation
Government Media = state propaganda
aboriginal = native slave actually “original” people
obstructing justice = No consent to show Identification or answer unlawful questions
Probable cause = anything you might be doing , an excuse to arrest
proceeds of crime = anything the police want to steal from you
Legal acts = A collection of statutory provisions that require consent
lawyers / attorneys = court facilitators paid to translate legalese .
Legal jurisdiction = legalese , language with legal definitions.
Lawful jurisdiction = language of common law , natural language
Person = Legal fiction created by registration contract at birth
Birth certificate = original registration contract of legal personality
Social insurance / SS = consent to allow a tax levy on employment

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

 

Read More

ORIGINAL SOVEREIGN TRIBAL FEDERATION MELBOURNE TREATY SIGNING CEREMONY

..................................ATTENTION..............................................               ..............186 Customs House........................
WILL BE HOLDING O-S-T-F TREATY SIGNING CEREMONY AND LORE TALK ON THIS WEDNESDAY 9TH JANUARY 1PM AT 186 GERTRUDE ST FITZROY. 

ALL ARE WELCOME TO ATTEND IT IS FREE AND YOU WILL RECEIVE A FORMAL NOTICE OF TREATY FROM THE O-S-T-F. 

YOU DON'T HAVE TO BRING ANYTHING BUT A GOOD SENSE OF HONOR......

maybe a camera if you want your photo taken of your treaty.........

note the roo skin is full so we, have it in the form of a document now and you will get a copy for your files.

hope to see you there......

peace and good will to all.

boya-kung.

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

 

Read More

ADMIRALTY LAW, CONTRACTS LAW, WHAT ARE THE RULES

https://soundcloud.com/contract-law-and-debt/admirlaty-law-contracts-law

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More

ROBERT ARTHUR: MENARD LETTER TO CANADIAN FIRST NATION GROUP 'IDLE NO MORE'

Rob: Menard published a letter to the 'Idle No More' group in facebook. Idle No More is a 'First Nations' group in Canada dedicated to illustrating the nefarious actions of the Harper government towards 'first nation' people. At any rate, i liked Rob's letter so much here at Mikiverse Law that i decided to share it with you all. 

TO: Idle NO More
FROM: Divided NO More

Hello and Good day! I am Robert-Arthur: Menard, a Freeman-on-the-Land, and I extend my heartiest hello and warmest regards. I am, according to some members of the Canadian Judicial System, a Freedom Guru, and outspoken advocate for the Freeman movement. The Freemen, although labeled as 'anti-government' are in fact 'pro-good government' and we wish we had it. Having come to the conclusion that the present crop of politicians are not serving the interest of the People of the Country, be they 'indigenous' or some 'non', we have revoked consent to be governed like children and question the fiction which is 'The Crown'.

We do not see a 'Crown', nor much of a difference between people. After all, are we not all people, responsible for our own actions? Are we not all equally here for such a very brief time, and loved equally by the Creator? Are we not all stardust rendered aware, and capable of love?

Concepts and philosophies I have shared have been successfully used by indigenous people in New Zealand, and have resulted in them being deeply empowered against the 'Crown' there. Much of the deception the people who point to The Crown rely upon is identical in all former British Colonies, and I believe there is significant remedy of which you are likely unaware. You also face many challenges and hurdles, and if your ideas are not properly presented to the population of Canada, it will result in a rejection of your actions, with more division enabling those who use 'The Crown' to further subjugate us all.

There must be a way for all people, regardless of who their grandparents were, or what they did to each other, to work together to find a path of peace and abundance for all. The Canadian people are not your enemy, and it would seem that those who claim to be acting as representatives, are enemies to us all, save their own political agendas.

There are so many Canadians who are deeply upset with the treachery, deceit and corporate toadyism of the various governments, that maybe the time is right for dialogue between the people, with those who claim to be acting for the Crown shut out. The plain and simple truth is, the government seems to be against all the people in the land, and apparently seek to pit us against each other. Perhaps our forefathers were stupid enough to fall for their tactics; I am hopeful we can do better. If we are to divide ourselves for things we can't control, such as who our parents were, then we might as well divide ourselves based on what we can control, such as the colour of our socks. In my mind, doing either are equally ludicrous.

This is not to mean I reject your heritage, or that of anyone else. For one, if not for the various heritages and cultures, we would not enjoy the variety of dishes available. I believe that all heritages form important parts of the majestic tapestry which is humanity, with no thread more important than another. Certainly I do not want to see those colourful threads bleached white by homogenous profit seeking corporations, though sadly that seems to be the present trend. To me assimilation is the process employed by the Borg. I want a rich tapestry, but without the previous division and fear and judgment which afflicted our forefathers.

I must tell you, I do not believe the people who hide behind the concept of the Crown will ever provide you the remedy you seek. They are addicted to their fictions, rely heavily upon deceit and lies, and only the truth will bring healing and peace. They create division where unity is needed, and seed ignorance where wisdom is called for. Their purpose is to extract as much wealth from this country as possible and as long as we argue amongst ourselves about our dwindling shares, they take more. They are the only ones who benefit when people divide themselves.

For the people of Canada however, I believe it is a different story. I believe the average Canadian to be fair and just, when not being led by their fears, and that there is a growing sense of unity and spiritual consciousness. It is perhaps the case that what we are witnessing is in fact the the long awaited acceptance of a more spiritual outlook, one practiced instinctively so long ago by your ancestors. Certainly for our planet to survive, a more traditional outlook and awareness of our place within the environment as stewards of the land is required.

Your ancestors knew something that many now apparently forget. That is the right to engage in The Process of Treaty. You do not have to waste your time demanding that old Treaties, made between those now long dead, be enforced, renegotiated or honoured. There is no need to complain about how they were dishonoured by those who rely on fictions. You are dealing with politicians who will lie and cheat to ensure their corporate friends find profit. They cannot be trusted and do not represent the will of the majority of Canadians.

Since those old Treaties have been apparently abandoned by those now in office, why not claim the right to Treaty again, and this time, seek agreement not with 'The Crown', as it is simply an imaginary fiction which many Canadians are starting to reject, but with the people of Canada, as equals? As Brothers, Sisters, Fathers, Mothers what is stopping us from finding our peace, without empowering the liars in the government by acknowledging their fictions or asking them to do it for us? Are we but children who need their guidance and oversight? Or are we adults, with common goals and shared desires? Do we not all want to watch our children grow and inherit a nation where all are encouraged to find their passions, and enjoy peace and abundance in a spirit of unity and friendship, recognizing equality within the human family?

It will be a difficult path at first I imagine. It will require forgiveness on the part of one, and an abandonment of judgment on the other. Likely the latter will be the more difficult, as often with the abandonment of judgment of others, how we have been acting becomes more apparent, and a burden of shame can result. It is at that point the forgiveness becomes so important.

I would like to address your group. I would like to share with you all a vision I have had for this country, and explain the perspective of the Freemen. I would like to help you develop a comprehensive message to present to the people of Canada, and initiate a New Treaty Process with them directly, which does not rely upon the corporate puppets masquerading as representatives. I would like to help you create a historic Treaty not with the fictional 'Crown', but with The People. I would like to do so with an eye to creating a proper body politic called “The People of Canada', which includes all people, with divisional statuses eschewed.

I want to throw a party, and not invite 'The Crown'.

I think it is the only way the people of Canada will find the peace and abundance which is our birthright, as Startdust. Truthfully, I think we have an opportunity to show the entire world a better way, and I think with that opportunity, comes a corresponding duty.

Humbly and hopefully, I await your response.
Sincerely,
Robert-Arthur: Menard

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

 

Read More

AUSTRALIA: MALAYSIA � AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (MAFTA) CONFIRMED TO COMMENCE ON 1 JANUARY 2013

20 December 2012 Article by Andrew Hudson 

Readers would be aware of earlier commentary on the signing of the Malaysia-Australia Free Trade Agreement ("MAFTA") on 22 May 2012 and many of the provisions of the MAFTA. This has also been the subject of presentation of various CBFCA Member Forums in 2012.
By way of Australian Customs Notice No. 2012/69, the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service has confirmed the commencement of the MAFTA as at 1 January 2013.
The Notice also summarises the rules for whether a good originates in Malaysia for the purposes of the MAFTA. The Notice also confirms that a Certificate of Origin is required to support the claim for MAFTA preferential treatment for imports which must be issued by a designated issuing authority in Malaysia and signed by parties authorised to sign such Certificates.
The Notice also sets out that a provision exists for the claim of refund on customs duty paid if it turns out after the date of importation that imported goods should have been entitled to preferential entry based on the MAFTA.
Of course, MAFTA also commences for Australian exporters and similar rules of origin apply in respect of Australian goods to ensure that they constitute Australian originating goods and are entitled to preferential treatment in Malaysia. However, Australian exporters do not need Certificates of Origin issued by an issuing authority but rather a Declaration of Origin which can be completed by the exporter itself or by a party on its behalf.
More details are in our earlier updates and on the Customs and DFAT websites and we would be delighted to assist.
http://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/212400/international+trade+investment/Malaysia+Australia+Free+Trade+Agreement+MAFTA+confirmed+to+commence+on+1+January+2013 

ETHICAL DONATORSAND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Read More