unitedstatessecurities

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, October 25, 2012

THE SUPREME COURT SEAL, COMMONWEALTH AND VICTORIAN COAT OF ARMS

Posted on 8:16 PM by Unknown
Court Seal

The Supreme Court Seal

The Supreme Court Seal is often confused with the Supreme Court emblem or incorrectly referred to as the Court Coat of Arms and the Court Crest.
The true Court Seal is used by the Registry of the Court to seal documents such as warrants, certificates of admission to practise as a barrister and solicitor and probate orders and parchments. The small, round rubber stamp used by various members of the Judiciary and Court staff, is used in accordance with Rule 28.04(1) of the Supreme Court Rules which provides for those judiciary and staff to, "...have in his custody a stamp the design of which shall as near as practicable be the same as the design of the seal of the Court with the addition of..." The Rules then go on to say that marking a document with this stamp is sufficient compliance, where there is a requirement that a document be sealed with the seal of the Court.
The Supreme Court Seal bears a variation of the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and is inscribed thereon with the words "The Seal of the Supreme Court of the State of Victoria".

Coat of Arms

A "Coat of Arms" is a pictorial identification which historically was a means of identifying "friend" or "foe" during battle. Drawings and designs were used to mark a warrior's shield and sometimes his armour. The term Coat of Arms refers to the custom in the 11th to 15th centuries of displaying the Arms on a tunic or coat worn over armour.
Today a Coat of Arms is still used as a means of identification. It is also a sign of authority and the use of it is strictly limited to the holder. Permission to use a Coat of Arms must be sought from the relevant authority; for example, applications for permission to use the Royal Arms are made to the Official Secretary to the Governor-General.
The Royal Arms were first used by Richard the Lionheart and were modified many times over nine centuries until Queen Victoria succeeded to the throne in 1837. Queen Victoria adopted a simplified form of the Royal Arms which are still in use today by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
A Coat of Arms, often incorrectly referred to as a "Crest", is made up of a number of elements. In the Royal Coat of Arms, the shield shows the various Royal emblems of parts of Britain: the three lions of England in the first and fourth quarters, the lion of Scotland in the second and the harp of Ireland in the third. It is surrounded by a garter bearing the motto Honi soit qui mal y pense (Evil to him who evil thinks), which symbolises the Order of the Garter, an ancient Order of knighthood of which the Queen is Sovereign. The shield is supported by the English lion and the Scottish unicorn and is surmounted by the Royal Crown. Below it appears the motto of the Sovereign Dieu et mon droit (God and my right). The plant badges of the United Kingdom - rose, thistle and shamrock - are often displayed beneath the shield.
A Crest is an accessory to a Coat of Arms. Historically it was an emblem displayed on the helmet of a knight. A Crest appears above the shield or where there is a helmet in the Arms, above the helmet. In the Royal Coat of Arms the Crest is the crowned lion standing on the Royal Crown. The Supreme Court seal does not contain the Royal Crest as it is a symbol used exclusively by the Sovereign. In the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the Crest is the seven pointed gold star above the shield.
Supporters are the animals, birds or persons appearing on either side of the shield. The lion and the unicorn are the supporters in the Royal Coat of Arms.

The Commonwealth Coat of ArmsThe Commonwealth Coat of Arms

King Edward VII made the first official grant of a Coat of Arms to the Commonwealth of Australia by Royal Warrant of 7 May 1908. This Coat of Arms was fairly simple in design and included the Commonwealth star as a symbol of national unity (six of the points represent the six States - the seventh represents the Territories). The Arms however lacked any specific reference to the States and a new design was approved by King George V by Royal Warrant of 19 September 1912. That design included the addition of six 'quarters' to the shield, which represent the six States. It is this Coat of Arms which is used by the Commonwealth today.
In 1915 the Prime Minister Mr Fisher provided guidance for the use of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. He reminded officials that the Arms were intended to be used whenever it was necessary to denote Commonwealth property and where it was appropriate that such emblems be used.
The Coat of Arms is used by the Commonwealth on buildings, for example Parliament House Canberra and the Federal Courts. It also appears on departmental correspondence, legal tender and official documents such as passports.

The Victorian Coat of ArmsThe Victorian Coat of Arms

The Victorian Coat of Arms was granted by King George V by Royal Warrant of 6 June 1910. On 28 March 1973, Queen Elizabeth II signed a Royal Warrant which added Victoria's floral emblem, the Pink Heath, to Victoria's Coat of Arms. The Victorian Coat of Arms is used by State Government bodies, but not the Supreme or County Courts.

The Supreme Court Seal

The Supreme Court Seal bears an impression of the Royal Coat of Arms in accordance with the Act which established the Court in 1852 (15 Vic., No 10). That Act was called "An Act to make provision for the better Administration of Justice in the Colony of Victoria".
Section IX of the aforementioned Act stated "That the said Supreme Court of the Colony of Victoria shall be a Court of Record, and shall have and use as occasion may require, a Seal bearing an impression of the Royal Arms of England [sic], having inscribed on a label thereon the words "The Seal of the Supreme Court of the Colony of Victoria; and such Seal shall be delivered by the Lieutenant Governor of the said Colony to and be kept in the custody of the Chief Justice of the said Court".
Section 14 of the Supreme Court Act 1915 changed the wording on the Seal to "The Seal of the Supreme Court of the State of Victoria". Section 14 made some other minor amendments to s.IX of the 1852 Act as did s.76 of the Constitution Act 1975, but the overall meaning and authority as set out in s.IX of the Act remain in force today.
It is interesting to note that s.IX of the 1852 Act went on to say (para-phrased in "plain English"') that any person who forges the seal of or document issuing from the Court or who serves or enforces any such forged process, document etc, shall be guilty of felony; and being convicted thereof, shall be liable to be sentenced at the discretion of the Judge to be worked on the roads of the Colony for a period of between five and ten years; or up to three years' imprisonment. In 1915 the penalty for the said felony became imprisonment with or without hard labour for a term of not more than ten years.

Permissions

Permission to use the Victorian Coat of Arms was granted by the Protocol and Special Events Branch of the Department of Premier and Cabinet and permission to use the Commonwealth Coat of Arms was granted by the Awards and National Symbols Branch of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/home/about+the+court/history/court+seal/
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in 'Australia is a Crime Scene' - Robbie Thorpe, 100% Independent Australian Media, mikiverse, Mikiverse Headline News, Mikiverse Health, Mikiverse Law, Mikiverse Politics, Mikiverse Science | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • SEND THIS DOCUMENT TO THE JUDGE AND WATCH YOUR COURT CASE VANISH!
    http://freedomfromgovernment.us/?p=725  Taken from FREEDOM FROM GOVERNMENT webpage. Use the following freedom affidavit to let them know tha...
  • DECLARING YOURSELF AS A SECURE PARTY CREDITOR
    Published February 12, 2012 | By admin In the review of the steps necessary for filing your Redemption, the main and primary focus, for ...
  • JEAN KEATING ORLANDO FLORIDA SEMINAR
    Transcribed by Rockney Martineau 12/25/04 Jean Keating Work Shop   ______________________ INTRODUCTION By:   Michael Young               ...
  • THE UNIFORM SECURITIZATION SCHEME-THE BIRTH SCAM
    PLEASE NOTE: I do not know who authored this, but, think that it was a biological composition with the calling of Bill. I was presented with...
  • BEAT THE LAW "HOW TO GET DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY"
    ALL CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE OR FROM COL WILSON IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. ALL RIG...
  • COSMIC BLUEPRINTS OPEN FORUM TONY Z AND KATE OF GAIA
    Listen to internet radio with Critical Mass Radio on Blog Talk Radio ETHICAL   DONATORS  AND  COMMUNITY MEMBERS  REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SP...
  • WHEN ENGLAND BECAME A VASSAL STATE OF THE VATICAN.....THE SECRET TREATY OF VERONA 1213
    “On October 3rd 1213, King John, as ‘King of England Corporation Sole’ claimed autonomy over all the sovereign rights of England and ...
  • COSMIC BLUEPRINTS OPEN FORUM. TONY Z, KATE OF GAIA AND OTHERS TALK TO TAMI PEPPERMAN
    Listen to internet radio with Critical Mass Radio on Blog Talk Radio ETHICAL   DONATORS  AND  COMMUNITY MEMBERS  REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SP...
  • NEGOTIORUM GESTIO & NEGOTIORUM GESTOR AS DEFINED IN BLACKS LAW FIRST EDITION
    NEGOTIORUM GESTIO. Lat. In the civil law. Literally, a doing of business or businesses. A species of spontaneous agency, or an interference ...
  • LEAVING THE PFARM - OPPT DISCUSSION BY TAMI PEPPERMAN AND FRIENDS
    There are some terrible audio problems over the first 5-10 minutes then it really kicks off. The trend that I am noticing in the OPPT debate...

Categories

  • 'Australia is 100% Australian Independent Media (6)
  • 'Australia is a Crime Scene' - Robbie Thorpe (107)
  • 100% Australian Independent Media (392)
  • 100% Independent Australian Media (69)
  • 100% Independent Australian Media Australian Constitution (2)
  • A4V (2)
  • Administration and Probate Act 1958 - SECT 9 (1)
  • Australia is a Crime Scene (1)
  • Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (1)
  • Australian Independent Media (1)
  • Bill Turner (1)
  • Bills of Exchange Act 1909 (1)
  • Blacks Law (1)
  • Bono Vacantia (1)
  • Bouvier's (1)
  • Bruce Bell (1)
  • Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 (7)
  • Challenger (1)
  • COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA IS A CORPORATION. (1)
  • Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (1)
  • County Court owned by Liberty (1)
  • Daily Mail (1)
  • Dean Clifford (7)
  • Frank O’Collins (6)
  • Free Roger Hayes (2)
  • Freedom from Government (1)
  • Herald Sun (3)
  • high court (1)
  • High Court decisions (2)
  • http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com.au/ (24)
  • Idle No More (1)
  • Information Privacy Act 2000 (1)
  • Jean Keating (2)
  • Judiciary Act 1903 S.40 (1)
  • King James II of Australia (1)
  • Larry Hannigan (1)
  • Liberty (1)
  • Mark A Robinson (1)
  • Mark McMurtrie (23)
  • Master in Equity (1)
  • Mens Rea (1)
  • Mental Health Act (1)
  • Mika of the family Rasila (4)
  • mikiverse (486)
  • Mikiverse Headline News (464)
  • Mikiverse Health (492)
  • Mikiverse Law (490)
  • Mikiverse Politics (494)
  • Mikiverse Science (488)
  • mikiverse.com (23)
  • MikiverseLaw (6)
  • Motor Car Act 1909 (1)
  • NATIONAL TRANSPORT COMMISSION (ROAD TRANSPORT LEGISLATION—AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES) REGULATIONS 2006 (1)
  • NSW Law Reform Commission (1)
  • OPPT (8)
  • Original Soveregn Tribal Federation (5)
  • Originie Australian (2)
  • OSTF (9)
  • Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1872 (1)
  • Police Brutality (1)
  • PUBLIC NOTICE (1)
  • Real Justice (1)
  • RealJustice (1)
  • Robert Arthur Menard (4)
  • Robert Menard (4)
  • Rod Class (3)
  • Roger Hayes (1)
  • RT (1)
  • Rumble-v-Liverpool Plains Shire Council No. 2011/58125 (1)
  • S 16 Motor Car Act 1909 (1)
  • S.76 Sentencing Act 1991 (1)
  • Santos Bonacci (1)
  • Stefan Molyneux (1)
  • Tami Pepperman (3)
  • The Judiciary Act 1903 (1)
  • The Mikiverse (3)
  • UCC Financing Statement (1)
  • Vimeo (1)
  • Wayne Glew (1)
  • Winston Shrout (1)
  • You Tube (24)
  • Your CAR is NOT a MOTOR VEHICLE (3)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (304)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (28)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (66)
    • ►  January (32)
  • ▼  2012 (196)
    • ►  December (48)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ▼  October (15)
      • THE PHARAONIC USE OF THE NAME OR THE NOMEN IN ANCI...
      • REMARKS OF THE HON MARILYN WARREN AC CHIEF JUSTICE...
      • WHAT THE FUQ? - FREQUENTLY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS OF...
      • THE SUPREME COURT SEAL, COMMONWEALTH AND VICTORIAN...
      • PATENTS CHANGE MAY HELP DRUG FIRMS
      • SA POLICE STOPPED FROM SELLING, CRUSHING CARS AFTE...
      • A TORT TIME BOMB
      • LAWBOOK CO. CASEBOOK—EQUITY AND TRUSTS COMMENTARY...
      • CROWN: SOVEREIGNTY: AUSTRALIA'S STONE OF SCONE
      • GOVERNMENT AND JUDGES USE CLAIMS OF MENTALLY ILL T...
      • WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SUPREME COURT ACT 1935 S. 24 AN...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (37)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (1)
Powered by Blogger.