unitedstatessecurities

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, October 13, 2012

WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SUPREME COURT ACT 1935 S. 24 AND 2010 AMENDMENT

Posted on 10:13 PM by Unknown

SUPREME COURT ACT 1935 - SECT 24

24 .         Law and equity to be concurrently administered

        (1A)         Subject to the express provisions of any other Act, in every civil cause or matter commenced in the Supreme Court, law and equity shall be administered by the Court according to the rules set out in subsections (1) to (7).
        (1)         If any plaintiff or petitioner claims to be entitled to any equitable estate or right, or to relief upon any equitable ground against any deed, instrument, or contract, or against any right, title, or claim whatsoever asserted by any defendant or respondent in such cause or matter, or to any relief founded upon a legal right, which before the commencement of the Supreme Court Act 1880 6 could only have been given by a court of equity, the Court, and every judge thereof, shall give to such plaintiff or petitioner such and the same relief as ought to have been given by the Court in its equitable jurisdiction in a suit or proceeding for the same or the like purpose properly instituted before the commencement of the said Act.
        (2)         If any defendant claims to be entitled to any equitable estate or right or to relief upon any equitable ground against any deed, instrument, or contract, or against any right, title or claim asserted by any plaintiff or petitioner in such cause or matter, or alleges any ground of equitable defence to any claim of the plaintiff or petitioner in such cause or matter, the Court, and every judge thereof, shall give to every equitable estate, right, or ground of relief so claimed, and to every equitable defence so alleged, such and the same effect, by way of defence against the claim of such plaintiff or petitioner, as the Court in its equitable jurisdiction ought to have given if the same or the like matters had been relied on by way of defence in any suit or proceeding instituted by the Court for the same or the like purpose before the commencement of the Supreme Court Act 1880  6 .
        (3)         The Court, and every judge thereof, shall have power to grant to any defendant in respect of any equitable estate or right, or other matter of equity, and also in respect of any legal estate, right, or title claimed or asserted by him — 
            (a)         all such relief against any plaintiff or petitioner as such defendant shall have properly claimed, by his pleading, and as the Court, or any judge thereof, might have granted in any suit instituted for that purpose by the same defendant against the same plaintiff or petitioner; and
            (b)         all such relief relating to or connected with the original subject of the cause or matter, and in like manner claimed against any other person, whether already a party to the same cause or matter or not, who shall have been duly served with notice in writing of such claim pursuant to any rule of court or any order of the Court, as might properly have been granted against such person if he had been made a defendant to a cause duly instituted by the same defendant for the like purpose.
        (3A)         Every person served with any such notice as mentioned in subsection (3)(b) shall thenceforth be deemed a party to such cause or matter, with the same rights in respect of his defence against such claim, as if he had been duly sued in the ordinary way by such defendant.
        (4)         The Court, and every judge thereof, shall recognize and take notice of all equitable estates, titles, and rights, and all equitable duties and liabilities appearing incidentally in the course of any cause or matter, in the same manner in which the Court in its equitable jurisdiction would have recognized and taken notice of the same in any suit or proceeding duly instituted therein before the commencement of the Supreme Court Act 1880 6 .
        (5)         No cause or proceeding at any time pending in the Supreme Court shall be restrained by prohibition or injunction; but every matter of equity on which an injunction against the prosecution of any such cause or proceeding might have been obtained, if the Supreme Court Act 1880 6 had not been passed, either unconditionally or on any terms or conditions, may be relied on by way of defence thereto.
        (5A)         However —
            (a)         nothing in this Act shall disable the Court, if it thinks fit, from directing a stay of proceedings in any cause or matter pending before it; and
            (b)         any person, whether a party or not to any such cause or matter, who would have been entitled, if the Supreme Court Act 1880 6 had not been passed, to apply to any court to restrain the prosecution thereof, or who may be entitled to enforce, by attachment or otherwise, any judgment, decree, rule, or order, contrary to which all or any part of the proceedings in such cause or matter may have been taken, may apply to the Court, by motion in a summary way, for a stay of proceedings in such cause or matter, either generally or so far as may be necessary for the purposes of justice; and the Court shall thereupon make such order as shall be just.
        (6)         Subject to the foregoing provisions for giving effect to equitable rights and other matters of equity, and to the other express provisions of this Act, the Court, and every judge thereof, shall recognize and give effect to all legal claims and demands, and all estates, titles, rights, duties, obligations, and liabilities existing by the common law or by any custom, or created by any statute, in the same manner as the same would have been recognized and given effect to if the Supreme Court Act 1880 6 had not been passed in any branch of its jurisdiction, or by the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes.
        (7)         The Court, in the exercise of the jurisdiction vested in it by this Act, in every cause or matter pending before it, shall have power to grant, and shall grant, either absolutely or on such reasonable terms and conditions as shall seem just, all such remedies whatsoever as any of the parties thereto may appear to be entitled to in respect of any and every legal or equitable claim properly brought forward by them in such cause or matter; so that, as far as possible, all matters so in controversy between the parties may be completely and finally determined, and all multiplicity of legal proceedings concerning any of such matters avoided.
        [Section 24 amended by No. 19 of 2010 s. 51.]
        [Heading inserted by No. 19 of 2010 s. 44(2).]
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in 100% Australian Independent Media, Cestui Que Vie Act 1666, mikiverse, Mikiverse Headline News, Mikiverse Health, Mikiverse Law, Mikiverse Politics | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • SEND THIS DOCUMENT TO THE JUDGE AND WATCH YOUR COURT CASE VANISH!
    http://freedomfromgovernment.us/?p=725  Taken from FREEDOM FROM GOVERNMENT webpage. Use the following freedom affidavit to let them know tha...
  • DECLARING YOURSELF AS A SECURE PARTY CREDITOR
    Published February 12, 2012 | By admin In the review of the steps necessary for filing your Redemption, the main and primary focus, for ...
  • JEAN KEATING ORLANDO FLORIDA SEMINAR
    Transcribed by Rockney Martineau 12/25/04 Jean Keating Work Shop   ______________________ INTRODUCTION By:   Michael Young               ...
  • THE UNIFORM SECURITIZATION SCHEME-THE BIRTH SCAM
    PLEASE NOTE: I do not know who authored this, but, think that it was a biological composition with the calling of Bill. I was presented with...
  • BEAT THE LAW "HOW TO GET DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY"
    ALL CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE OR FROM COL WILSON IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. ALL RIG...
  • WHEN ENGLAND BECAME A VASSAL STATE OF THE VATICAN.....THE SECRET TREATY OF VERONA 1213
    “On October 3rd 1213, King John, as ‘King of England Corporation Sole’ claimed autonomy over all the sovereign rights of England and ...
  • COSMIC BLUEPRINTS OPEN FORUM TONY Z AND KATE OF GAIA
    Listen to internet radio with Critical Mass Radio on Blog Talk Radio ETHICAL   DONATORS  AND  COMMUNITY MEMBERS  REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SP...
  • COSMIC BLUEPRINTS OPEN FORUM. TONY Z, KATE OF GAIA AND OTHERS TALK TO TAMI PEPPERMAN
    Listen to internet radio with Critical Mass Radio on Blog Talk Radio ETHICAL   DONATORS  AND  COMMUNITY MEMBERS  REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SP...
  • NEGOTIORUM GESTIO & NEGOTIORUM GESTOR AS DEFINED IN BLACKS LAW FIRST EDITION
    NEGOTIORUM GESTIO. Lat. In the civil law. Literally, a doing of business or businesses. A species of spontaneous agency, or an interference ...
  • LEAVING THE PFARM - OPPT DISCUSSION BY TAMI PEPPERMAN AND FRIENDS
    There are some terrible audio problems over the first 5-10 minutes then it really kicks off. The trend that I am noticing in the OPPT debate...

Categories

  • 'Australia is 100% Australian Independent Media (6)
  • 'Australia is a Crime Scene' - Robbie Thorpe (107)
  • 100% Australian Independent Media (392)
  • 100% Independent Australian Media (69)
  • 100% Independent Australian Media Australian Constitution (2)
  • A4V (2)
  • Administration and Probate Act 1958 - SECT 9 (1)
  • Australia is a Crime Scene (1)
  • Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (1)
  • Australian Independent Media (1)
  • Bill Turner (1)
  • Bills of Exchange Act 1909 (1)
  • Blacks Law (1)
  • Bono Vacantia (1)
  • Bouvier's (1)
  • Bruce Bell (1)
  • Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 (7)
  • Challenger (1)
  • COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA IS A CORPORATION. (1)
  • Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (1)
  • County Court owned by Liberty (1)
  • Daily Mail (1)
  • Dean Clifford (7)
  • Frank O’Collins (6)
  • Free Roger Hayes (2)
  • Freedom from Government (1)
  • Herald Sun (3)
  • high court (1)
  • High Court decisions (2)
  • http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com.au/ (24)
  • Idle No More (1)
  • Information Privacy Act 2000 (1)
  • Jean Keating (2)
  • Judiciary Act 1903 S.40 (1)
  • King James II of Australia (1)
  • Larry Hannigan (1)
  • Liberty (1)
  • Mark A Robinson (1)
  • Mark McMurtrie (23)
  • Master in Equity (1)
  • Mens Rea (1)
  • Mental Health Act (1)
  • Mika of the family Rasila (4)
  • mikiverse (486)
  • Mikiverse Headline News (464)
  • Mikiverse Health (492)
  • Mikiverse Law (490)
  • Mikiverse Politics (494)
  • Mikiverse Science (488)
  • mikiverse.com (23)
  • MikiverseLaw (6)
  • Motor Car Act 1909 (1)
  • NATIONAL TRANSPORT COMMISSION (ROAD TRANSPORT LEGISLATION—AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES) REGULATIONS 2006 (1)
  • NSW Law Reform Commission (1)
  • OPPT (8)
  • Original Soveregn Tribal Federation (5)
  • Originie Australian (2)
  • OSTF (9)
  • Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1872 (1)
  • Police Brutality (1)
  • PUBLIC NOTICE (1)
  • Real Justice (1)
  • RealJustice (1)
  • Robert Arthur Menard (4)
  • Robert Menard (4)
  • Rod Class (3)
  • Roger Hayes (1)
  • RT (1)
  • Rumble-v-Liverpool Plains Shire Council No. 2011/58125 (1)
  • S 16 Motor Car Act 1909 (1)
  • S.76 Sentencing Act 1991 (1)
  • Santos Bonacci (1)
  • Stefan Molyneux (1)
  • Tami Pepperman (3)
  • The Judiciary Act 1903 (1)
  • The Mikiverse (3)
  • UCC Financing Statement (1)
  • Vimeo (1)
  • Wayne Glew (1)
  • Winston Shrout (1)
  • You Tube (24)
  • Your CAR is NOT a MOTOR VEHICLE (3)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (304)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (28)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (66)
    • ►  January (32)
  • ▼  2012 (196)
    • ►  December (48)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ▼  October (15)
      • THE PHARAONIC USE OF THE NAME OR THE NOMEN IN ANCI...
      • REMARKS OF THE HON MARILYN WARREN AC CHIEF JUSTICE...
      • WHAT THE FUQ? - FREQUENTLY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS OF...
      • THE SUPREME COURT SEAL, COMMONWEALTH AND VICTORIAN...
      • PATENTS CHANGE MAY HELP DRUG FIRMS
      • SA POLICE STOPPED FROM SELLING, CRUSHING CARS AFTE...
      • A TORT TIME BOMB
      • LAWBOOK CO. CASEBOOK—EQUITY AND TRUSTS COMMENTARY...
      • CROWN: SOVEREIGNTY: AUSTRALIA'S STONE OF SCONE
      • GOVERNMENT AND JUDGES USE CLAIMS OF MENTALLY ILL T...
      • WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SUPREME COURT ACT 1935 S. 24 AN...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
      • COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA CITATION: MEADS ...
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (37)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (1)
Powered by Blogger.